Saheefa Jabbar Khattak Faces Backlash for Publicly Shaming House Help
Saheefa Jabbar Khattak, a model-turned-actor, has sparked controversy after criticizing her house help’s spending choices on Instagram. The backlash highlights a larger debate on charity, entitlement, and dignity.
Khattak publicly shared how Musarrat, her house help, spent Rs50,000 on Eid clothes and a bicycle for her children instead of essentials. Labeling it as “wasteful,” she expressed disappointment, insisting she would have made “better” financial decisions.
Insensitive Post Sparks Criticism
Instead of a private conversation, Khattak chose to air her grievances online, exposing personal details about Musarrat’s home and financial situation. She described the leaky roof and lack of privacy in the bathroom, making many question whether Musarrat even consented to having her struggles broadcasted.
Social media users quickly condemned the post. One person wrote, “Shaming an uneducated woman in a language she can’t even read, to millions of people, by name. That’s not charity, it’s cruelty.”
Read: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Push for Child Safety
Defensive Response and Tone-Deaf Justifications
Rather than apologizing, Khattak doubled down in lengthy replies, defending her actions by listing the many “favors” she had done for Musarrat. She mentioned giving her toys, chocolates, PR packages, and shoot clothes, which only intensified the backlash.
Critics questioned why she was keeping score of her generosity. If she truly considered Musarrat family, why not have a private discussion instead of turning her into a public spectacle?
One user pointed out the contradiction, saying, “Maybe stop promoting overconsumption by modeling in luxury Eid campaigns before lecturing a struggling woman about financial choices.”
The Problem With Performative Charity
Khattak’s post reignited a long-standing debate about celebrity charity culture. Her approach seemed less about genuine support and more about control and validation.
Many believe true charity should be free of judgment and public humiliation. The idea that donors can dictate how recipients use aid reinforces power imbalances. In a class-divided society, charity often becomes a tool for entitlement rather than empowerment.
The Bigger Picture: Respecting Autonomy in Giving
Musarrat’s choice to spend her money on Eid celebrations was not reckless—it was human. Instead of questioning her priorities, many argue that Khattak should have celebrated her effort to bring joy to her family.
This situation serves as a reminder that true generosity is about respect, not control. Helping others should come without surveillance, conditions, or public scrutiny.
If charity is about dignity and support, then perhaps the best way to give is quietly, sincerely, and with empathy—not through a public Instagram rant.
Follow us on Google News, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook,Whats App, and TikTok for latest updates
