The fate of Trump’s tariffs now hangs in balance after a federal appeals court ruled that the former president exceeded his legal authority when he imposed sweeping import duties. The 7-4 decision, handed down in Washington DC, represents the most significant legal defeat to Trump’s trade policies yet and sets up a high-stakes showdown in the US Supreme Court.
The Court’s Decision
The appeals court made clear that the president cannot unilaterally impose tariffs on global trading partners under existing law. Judges acknowledged that US law grants presidents broad authority to act during national emergencies. However, they ruled that this authority does not extend to imposing taxes or tariffs without congressional approval.
The judges wrote that Trump’s measures were “unbounded in scope, amount and duration” and far exceeded the limits of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). They added that it was unlikely Congress ever intended to hand presidents unlimited tariff powers through the statute.
The Tariffs in Question
The case focused on tariffs introduced on April 2, a day Trump branded “liberation day.” His administration imposed a baseline 10% tariff on nearly all US trading partners, along with additional “reciprocal” tariffs on countries he accused of treating the US unfairly.
The scope of the tariffs was unusually broad. Lesotho, a small African nation, faced a 50% tariff. Even uninhabited islands in the southern hemisphere, home only to penguins, were targeted with a 10% tariff.
The appeals court voided all of these measures, ruling that the actions asserted authority far beyond what the law permits.
Trump’s Legal Argument
Trump defended his tariffs by citing IEEPA, a law that allows presidents to regulate or block international transactions during national emergencies. He claimed that issues such as undocumented immigration and drug smuggling justified invoking the statute.
In February, he extended this reasoning to Canada, Mexico, and China, saying their failure to curb immigration and drugs across the US border amounted to a national emergency. This, he argued, gave him the power to impose tariffs.
The court disagreed, stating that the law does not give the president free rein to restructure trade policy through tariffs.
Read: Shehbaz and Modi arrive in China for SCO summit after years
What Happens Next?
Despite the ruling, Trump’s tariffs remain in place for now. The court delayed its decision from taking effect until October 14, giving the administration time to appeal. The case will almost certainly go before the US Supreme Court, where the conservative majority could prove more sympathetic to Trump’s arguments.
This pause also provides breathing space for the administration, which has collected significant revenue from the tariffs. The Treasury has taken in $159 billion from these duties by July, more than double the amount collected in the same period last year.
Economic Stakes
The financial consequences are enormous. If the Supreme Court ultimately upholds the lower court’s decision, the government may need to refund billions in tariff collections. The Justice Department has warned that overturning the tariffs could cause “financial ruin” for the United States.
Moreover, the ruling casts doubt on Trump’s ability to pursue his aggressive tariff agenda in the future. While other statutes give presidents limited tariff authority, they restrict both the size and duration of such measures.
For example, under the Trade Act of 1974, a president can impose tariffs to address trade deficits. But those tariffs cannot exceed 15% and must expire after 150 days. Such constraints would sharply limit Trump’s capacity to act as unilaterally as he has so far.
Trump’s Response
Trump reacted with anger, calling the appeals court “highly partisan.” On his social media platform, he warned that removing the tariffs would be “a total disaster for the Country.” He claimed the decision would “literally destroy the United States of America.”
In dozens of reposts and comments, he insisted that tariffs are “the best tool to help our workers,” even though studies show that the costs often fall on American consumers through higher prices.
Global Reactions
Internationally, Trump’s tariffs had already triggered alarm. They disrupted supply chains, rattled global markets, and stirred fears of inflation. Countries hit by the tariffs protested strongly, accusing the US of undermining the rules of global trade.
The appeals court ruling is likely to intensify those debates. If the Supreme Court strikes down the tariffs, global trade partners could push for refunds or seek clarity on US trade law.
What It Means for the Future
The case highlights a central tension in US trade policy: how much authority a president should have to reshape the global trading system without congressional oversight. For decades, Congress has guarded its role in setting tariff policy, while presidents have sought more flexibility to act swiftly.
Trump’s sweeping approach, imposing duties on nearly all trading partners at once, represents the boldest test of that balance in modern history. The outcome in the Supreme Court will decide not just the legality of his tariffs but also the limits of presidential power in economic policy.
As October approaches, businesses, governments, and consumers alike will be watching closely. The blood of this battle is not yet spilled, but the appeals court ruling has set the stage for a dramatic and consequential fight over the future of Trump’s tariffs.
Follow us on Instagram, YouTube, Facebook,, X and TikTok for latest updates
