Billions of Discarded Masks Now Threaten the Environment

The careless disposal of face masks pollution during the COVID-19 pandemic has created a growing environmental crisis. A new study warns that billions of single-use masks, especially N95 and similar types, are breaking down into microplastics and releasing toxic chemicals into ecosystems.

Massive Surge in Mask Use

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented rise in the use of disposable face masks (DFMs). Between March and October 2020, global use surged by nearly 9,000 percent. The World Health Organization estimated that 89 million medical masks were required daily during the peak months.

Globally, 129 billion masks were consumed every month. This overwhelming demand generated an enormous amount of waste, much of which was not properly managed.

Materials Behind the Problem

Most masks are made from polypropylene, a non-recyclable plastic. Other materials found in masks include polyethylene, polyester, nylon, polystyrene, and polycarbonate. These polymers act as filters, blocking airborne pathogens and hazardous particles.

Filtering Face Pieces (FFPs), such as N95 and N100 masks, proved especially effective in protecting against dust, smoke, vapors, and viruses. However, these same qualities make them more harmful to the environment once discarded.

Read: New COVID Variant Causes ‘Razor Blade’ Throat

Improper Disposal Practices

The study documented extensive improper disposal of masks during the pandemic. Researchers identified discarded DFMs on sidewalks, street gutters, parking lots, waterways, beaches, and parks. Rural and urban areas alike witnessed the careless dumping of these protective items.

Another report estimated that at the height of the pandemic, 3.4 billion masks were discarded worldwide every single day. Between September 2019 and October 2020, approximately 4.3 million tonnes of contaminated plastic waste from masks accumulated in just 11 major countries, including the U.S., U.K., Germany, and Australia.

Release of Microplastics

Laboratory experiments revealed that masks release alarming amounts of microplastics when exposed to water. Filtering Face Pieces discharged three to four times more particles compared to medical or surgical masks.

Notably, microplastic release occurred even without mechanical stress. This indicates that contamination begins during mask production itself, adding to the long-term risks.

Polypropylene dominated the microplastics identified, making up 93–97 percent in medical and disposable masks, and around 82–83 percent in FFPs. Other polymers such as polyethylene, polyester, polycarbonate, and nylon were also detected, though in smaller proportions.

Toxic Chemicals Found

The study also identified harmful chemicals leaching from discarded masks. Compounds like bisphenol B and sulfosuccinate were found in water samples containing mask fragments.

Bisphenol B acts as an endocrine disruptor, mimicking estrogen in humans and animals. Such chemicals can interfere with hormone systems, leading to birth defects, reproductive issues, and cancers.

In addition, leachates from masks contained substances that can impair the nervous system, weaken the immune system, and damage kidneys. These risks extend not only to humans but also to marine organisms exposed to contaminated waters.

Wider Environmental Damage

Marine life faces particular danger from mask-related plastic waste. Fibers and fragments shed from masks can enter the food chain, starting with plankton and small fish, and eventually reaching humans.

The study highlighted that fragments of polypropylene fibers were the most common form of debris. These fragments, once ingested, accumulate in tissues and disrupt natural biological functions.

Moreover, masks containing a broader mix of polymers, such as FFPs, introduce greater chemical variety into ecosystems. Researchers reported that FFPs released nearly 18 percent of non-polypropylene polymers, compared to only 3–7 percent from medical or surgical masks.

Scale of the Threat

The vast volume of discarded masks combined with their complex chemical makeup poses a unique challenge. Unlike other plastics, disposable masks cannot be recycled using conventional methods. Their contamination with biological material further complicates safe disposal.

The result is a growing layer of microplastics embedded in soil, rivers, and oceans. Scientists warn that this layer is altering biogeochemical processes, disrupting natural cycles, and creating long-term ecological harm.

Call for Policy Action

Researchers stress the urgent need for integrated policies to address face mask pollution. They argue that scientists, policymakers, PPE manufacturers, waste managers, and communities must collaborate to develop sustainable solutions.

Proposals include designing biodegradable masks, improving waste collection systems, and enforcing stricter disposal rules. Public awareness campaigns can also play a role in encouraging responsible mask use and disposal.

Towards Sustainable Solutions

The pandemic highlighted the essential role of masks in protecting public health. Yet it also exposed the unintended costs of relying on single-use plastics. As the world reflects on COVID-19, addressing mask-related pollution becomes part of preparing for future health crises.

By developing eco-friendly alternatives and stronger waste management systems, societies can reduce the environmental scars left behind by billions of discarded mask