Amid growing tensions in the Middle East, President Donald Trump abruptly left the G7 summit in Canada to focus on the Israel-Iran conflict. He returned to Washington late Monday, cutting short diplomatic discussions with world leaders.
Departure Sparks Global Attention
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced Trump’s early departure on X, citing the situation in the Middle East. “Because of what’s going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State,” she wrote.
Speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force One, Trump said, “We’re gonna have dinner with these wonderful leaders, and then I get on a plane. I have to be back early for obvious reasons.”
Prioritizing National Security
Trump requested that the National Security Council be ready in the Situation Room upon his return. An administration official confirmed this, highlighting the urgency of the situation.
During his flight back, Trump told reporters he aimed for a “real end” to the conflict between Israel and Iran, not just a temporary cease-fire. He mentioned the possibility of sending Vice President JD Vance and special envoy Steve Witkoff to open talks with Iran.
Trump also reignited fears about Iran’s nuclear intentions. He claimed Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon, directly contradicting earlier congressional testimony from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. “I don’t care what she said. I think they were very close to having it,” he stated.
Warnings and Caution
When asked about his warning for civilians to evacuate Tehran, Trump said it was not tied to an imminent strike. “I just wanted people to be safe,” he explained.
He also delivered a stern warning: if Iran attacks U.S. troops or assets, the response would be swift and severe. “We will come down so hard if they do anything to our people,” he said. “I think they know not to touch our troops.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio also returned to Washington with Trump.
Pakistan has recalled non-essential diplomatic staff and their families from Iran as part of precautionary steps to ensure diplomatic safety amid escalating tensions in the region. The decision comes in light of the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, which has raised security concerns for diplomatic missions.
Partial Withdrawal Announced
According to officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the recall only affects non-essential personnel and accompanying family members. The move is temporary and intended to reduce risks during the current unrest.
“This is a precautionary measure,” a senior ministry official confirmed. “Only those whose presence is not immediately required are being brought back.”
Embassy Operations to Continue
Despite the partial withdrawal, Pakistan’s embassy in Tehran and consulates in other Iranian cities will remain operational. Officials emphasized that the country’s diplomatic presence in Iran remains intact.
“Our mission is still functioning and will continue to provide services,” the official said. “There is no plan to suspend diplomatic activities.”
The decision follows heightened conflict between Iran and Israel, which began after Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian military and nuclear facilities. In response, Iran launched missile attacks on Israeli cities. The situation has sparked fears of a broader conflict that could draw in neighboring countries.
Pakistan’s move reflects the broader trend of regional caution. Other countries have also advised their citizens and diplomatic staff to exercise vigilance or consider relocation amid the crisis.
Support for Remaining Staff
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has instructed the embassy in Tehran to remain alert and ensure the safety of those who continue working on the ground.
Officials reaffirmed Pakistan’s commitment to safeguarding its nationals abroad and adapting to evolving developments in the region. Further assessments will determine whether additional measures are needed in the coming days.
The Balochistan government has announced its provincial budget for FY2025-26, In conclusion totaling Rs1,028 billion. Finance Minister Mir Shoaib Nosherwani presented the budget, calling it balanced and inclusive. It aims to promote development and improve public services across key sectors.
Surplus and Salaries
Total expenditures are set at Rs991 billion, leaving a surplus of Rs36.7 billion. However The government increased salaries by 10% and pensions by 7%, offering some relief to government employees and retirees.
Education Gets a Boost
The education sector saw major allocations. Rs28 billion was set for Early Childhood and school education. However Rs6.7 billion in international grants under the Global Partnership for Education will support reforms.
For FY2025-26, Rs19.8 billion has been allocated for school education development and Rs101 billion for non-development expenses. In conclusion Higher and Technical Education received Rs22.81 billion, with a 100% increase for universities.
The health sector will receive Rs16.4 billion for development and Rs71 billion for non-development expenses. New jobs and healthcare facilities are part of the plan.
Infrastructure and Development
The Communications and Works Department received the largest share of the development budget at 19%, totaling Rs55.21 billion. However The irrigation sector followed with Rs42.78 billion to improve water resources.
Agriculture and Rural Economy
Rs10 billion were allocated to agriculture development, with an additional Rs16 billion for recurring costs. However These funds aim to modernize farming practices and support rural communities.
Amid rising conflict in the Middle East, Pakistan has stepped up repatriation efforts, bringing back 618 nationals from Iran and Iraq. The move comes as tensions soar between Israel and Iran, putting thousands of Pakistani pilgrims and students at risk.
Return from Iran Intensifies
On Monday, 350 Pakistanis—305 pilgrims and 45 students—crossed into Pakistan through the Taftan border. Authorities have ensured access to medical care, food, shelter, and travel support for the evacuees.
The situation in Iran remains tense following Israel’s airstrikes targeting key military and nuclear sites last Friday.
Special Flights from Iraq
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated it is working closely with Iraqi Airways and local authorities to coordinate safe departures.
Zaireen in Iraq have been advised to stay in touch with the Pakistan Embassy in Baghdad and their designated representatives for updates. However Iraqi Airways continues to operate daily flights on the Basra–Dubai route, offering a viable return option for stranded Pakistanis.
In response to the evolving crisis, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif directed authorities to provide all necessary support for stranded nationals.
National Effort Underway
With evacuations ongoing, the government remains committed to ensuring the safe and timely return of all Pakistanis caught in the crossfire of escalating regional hostilities.
Pakistan and the United States have agreed to fast-track efforts toward a trade agreement as both nations face rising tensions over newly imposed reciprocal tariffs. The move follows US President Donald Trump’s decision to raise duties on several countries, including Pakistan, sparking concerns about global trade stability.
Virtual Meeting Sparks Momentum
On June 16, Pakistan’s Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb held a virtual meeting with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The discussion centered on the impact of the new tariffs and how both sides could move forward. According to Pakistan’s finance ministry, both parties expressed a shared commitment to finalize a trade deal as soon as possible.
Tariffs Threaten Pakistan’s Key Exports
The US recently imposed a steep 29 percent tariff on Pakistani exports, with textiles—Pakistan’s largest export sector—likely to suffer the most. Nearly 90 percent of Pakistan’s exports to the US are textiles, making the country highly vulnerable to such trade policies.
Pakistan exported goods worth $5.44 billion to the US in 2024. From July 2024 to February 2025 alone, exports reached $4 billion, marking a 10 percent increase compared to the same period last year. But the sudden tariff hike could reverse these gains and hit the country’s fragile economy hard.
Roadmap for Technical-Level Talks
During the meeting, both sides agreed to continue technical-level discussions in the coming days. They are working on a mutually agreed roadmap aimed at resolving the tariff issue and deepening economic cooperation.
Concerns Over Regional Competition
Trade analysts warn that the tariffs may damage Pakistan’s global competitiveness. If countries like China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh pivot more aggressively toward European markets, Pakistan could lose ground in alternate destinations, worsening its trade position.
Growing Urgency for a Deal
With economic recovery still underway after the COVID-19 pandemic, both nations appear eager to avoid further disruptions. The US remains Pakistan’s top export market, making a swift resolution not only desirable but essential for economic stability.
The ongoing regional escalation between Israel and Iran intensified on Tuesday as both countries launched fresh strikes, now marking the fifth consecutive day of hostilities. Global concerns are growing that the conflict could drag other nations into a broader Middle East war.
Israeli Strikes Hit Deep Inside Iran
Israel’s military confirmed a wave of attacks targeting missile and drone facilities in western Iran. These strikes, described as “extensive,” hit key military sites, including several installations involved in Iran’s missile program.
Iranian state media reported loud explosions in Tabriz, a strategic northwestern city that houses an air force base. Israel has targeted this area repeatedly since launching its first surprise assault on Friday.
In Kashan, located in central Iran, three civilians were killed and four injured following Israeli missile strikes. Iran’s Nour News stated that the attack damaged infrastructure and left multiple casualties.
A residential building in Tehran was hit, prompting emergency teams to rescue three people from the debris. The strike has added to growing domestic unrest and fears among Iranian civilians of further escalation.
Iran Responds with Missile Barrage
Iran retaliated with another round of missile strikes targeting Israeli cities. Explosions and rising smoke were reported in Herzliya, near Tel Aviv. Israeli defense systems intercepted some incoming missiles, though details about damage and casualties remain limited.
International Tensions Rise
US President Donald Trump called for the immediate evacuation of Tehran, further escalating tensions. Analysts warn that direct US involvement could ignite a much larger conflict across the Middle East.
Meanwhile, international agencies like the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) continue to warn that the ongoing conflict poses grave threats to nuclear facilities and diplomacy in the region.
With both sides showing no signs of backing down, fears of a broader regional war continue to grow. The situation remains volatile, with each day bringing new risks and global uncertainty.
While the world watches the devastating human cost of conflicts in Gaza, Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, and the rising hostilities between Israel and Iran, scientists warn of a less visible but equally catastrophic consequence: climate and environmental degradation. According to recent studies and environmental watchdog reports, modern warfare is significantly exacerbating the climate crisis through destruction of infrastructure, deforestation, emissions from heavy military machinery, and contamination of water and soil.
“War accelerates environmental collapse,” says Dr. Clara Hoskins, an environmental scientist with the International Climate Action Network. “Beyond the bombs and bullets, war damages ecosystems, destroys carbon sinks, and poisons the air and water for years or even decades.”
Military Emissions and Destruction of Carbon Sinks
The defense sector is one of the world’s largest emitters of greenhouse gases, and ongoing conflicts have intensified those emissions. Military operations rely heavily on fossil fuels — tanks, fighter jets, warships, and trucks consume massive quantities of diesel and aviation fuel. In the Ukraine-Russia war alone, CO₂ emissions from fuel usage, infrastructure destruction, and fires have already crossed over 120 million metric tons, according to the Conflict and Environment Observatory (CEOBS).
In Gaza, scientists say Israel’s relentless bombing campaign has not only killed thousands but also destroyed key urban infrastructure and green cover, turning parts of the region into wastelands. Burning buildings release particulate matter and toxic gases, increasing local pollution levels.
Forests in Syria and Yemen have been wiped out due to military activity, depriving those regions of vital carbon sinks. The civil war in Yemen has led to rampant deforestation, as desperate families turn to wood for fuel amid fuel shortages.
Bombs and chemical munitions don’t just destroy cities; they contaminate soils and groundwater, often irreversibly. In Gaza and Syria, agricultural lands have been rendered unusable due to explosive residue, chemical pollutants, and salinization from bombings. In Ukraine, reports have surfaced of industrial chemical leaks from damaged factories and oil depots, some of which threaten to pollute the Dnipro River and Black Sea.
Dr. Marina Fedorova, an ecotoxicologist from the European Environmental Agency, says, “What’s happening in Ukraine is an environmental disaster. Rivers, farmlands, and entire ecosystems have been contaminated. Recovery could take decades — if peace comes soon.”
Meanwhile, Iranian oil fields are under threat from Israeli missile strikes, posing a risk of massive oil spills and air pollution should storage sites be hit. Similar fears are rising in Syria, where ISIS-era oil fires are still fresh in memory.
Scientists Call for Climate Ceasefires and Green Accountability
The environmental impact of war often escapes global attention — but scientists are urging immediate action. A growing coalition of climate scientists, peace activists, and UN officials are calling for “climate ceasefires” — temporary halts in hostilities to allow environmental assessment and restoration. They also want countries to include military emissions in national climate reports, something that is currently voluntarily reported — or not at all.
“War and climate change are intertwined crises,” says UN climate advisor Dr. Farid Al-Mansoori. “If we want a habitable planet, we must reduce both bombs and carbon.”
In their upcoming October climate summit, UN officials plan to introduce a resolution urging war-affected countries to conduct environmental impact audits and hold combatants accountable for long-term ecological damage.
As conflicts escalate and peace remains elusive, the planet continues to bear silent scars — scars that may outlast the wars themselves.
A major controversy has erupted over Pakistan’s sixth round of the Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance (IBBS) on HIV. Allegations of data manipulation, survey misconduct, and methodological flaws have led to intense scrutiny from international health organizations, civil society groups, and government officials. The $3.2 million project was conducted by a consortium including a public university, Progressive Development Initiative (PDI), and the WHO Collaborating Center on HIV Surveillance (HIVHUB Iran).
Stakeholders—including WHO, UNAIDS, and the Khawaja Sara Society—have raised red flags about survey credibility, citing the exclusion of key test results and manipulation of diagnostic data. The IBBS Round-6 was designed to assess HIV prevalence among key populations, including people who inject drugs (PWID), men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender persons (TGs), female sex workers (FSWs), and prisoners in 31 districts across Pakistan.
A major point of concern involves the failure to retest thousands of individuals whose rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) showed faint reactive lines—indicators that WHO and test manufacturers regard as potentially HIV positive. Internal documents reveal over 723 such results were ignored, raising fears of intentional underreporting.
Stakeholders Demand Accountability and Independent Review
Despite repeated instructions to confirm faint-line results through further testing, the IBBS implementers allegedly neglected protocols. This sparked outrage among stakeholders, who believe the omission might be an attempt to understate Pakistan’s HIV burden for political or funding reasons.
Dr. Shabana Saleem, Director General of Health at the Ministry of National Health Services, expressed serious concerns and urged colleagues to thoroughly evaluate the findings before finalization. The Common Management Unit (CMU) for AIDS, TB, and Malaria has also called for an “independent, transparent third-party review” to restore the study’s credibility.
Preliminary IBBS Round-6 results showed a rise in HIV prevalence among TGs (10%), MSM (7%), and FSWs (3.8%), but a reported decline among PWID to 27%. These figures, however, are now disputed due to the untested faint reactive results.
Community-based organizations have strongly condemned the survey process and findings. Moon Ali, Director of Programmes at the Khawaja Sara Society, said the figures presented in the report contradict field realities and past data. “Our community-based data shows significantly higher intervention coverage and risk behavior,” he said.
He also criticized the narrow definition of MSM used in the survey, which limited respondents to those reporting sexual activity in the last 30 days. WHO’s regional office had recommended a 12-month recall period to better reflect real population behavior and risks.
Additionally, discrepancies were noted in reported condom use and safer sex practices, further casting doubt on the reliability of the findings.
Political Fallout and Institutional Oversight Failures
The scandal has major implications for Pakistan’s public health policy and global health partnerships. Underreporting HIV prevalence could jeopardize international funding and misguide intervention efforts.
Email records and internal communications reviewed by The News indicate that PDI’s Simon Nazariah played a central role in coordinating the survey and approving key components. The involvement of PDI in oversight and implementation raised concerns about conflict of interest.
Furthermore, reputed national institutions like the University of Health Sciences (UHS) and Institute of Management Sciences (IMS) Peshawar were excluded from the survey process. The Iranian-based HIVHUB, despite its WHO affiliation, was sidelined during critical stages.
With pressure mounting, the Ministry of National Health Services is reportedly considering a formal third-party audit to assess the integrity of the IBBS Round-6 and ensure future HIV surveillance is accurate, inclusive, and transparent.
At least 51 Palestinians were killed and more than 200 others injured on Monday in what witnesses are calling a massacre, after Israeli forces attacked an aid distribution site in southern Gaza, according to medical officials and local eyewitnesses. The crowd had gathered in search of food, as famine and acute hunger continue to grip the besieged territory.
“Tens of thousands of hungry civilians gathered for the aid. Two Israeli shells were dropped in the middle of the crowd. Dozens of civilians, including children, were killed, and no one could help or save lives,” said Saeed Abu Liba, 38, who survived the incident. “May God punish the Israelis for their crimes.”
The attack took place near one of the food distribution sites operated under the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) system, which is supported by Israel and the United States. Witnesses said the chaos began with explosions, followed by Israeli drones and tanks firing on the crowd.
Survivors Describe Horror and Chaos
Several survivors described the attack as a deliberate massacre. Yousef Nofal, who was near the front of the queue, said he saw people fall one after another as gunfire rang out. “It was a massacre,” he said. “Israeli soldiers kept firing even when people tried to run away.”
Mohammed Abu Qeshfa, another survivor, said he heard a loud explosion and then heavy gunfire from tanks positioned nearby. “I survived by a miracle,” he said, his voice trembling as he recalled the chaos.
The scene was filled with panic and desperation. Many injured civilians lay on the ground without immediate medical attention due to the intensity of the shelling. “People were screaming and calling for help. The area turned into a battlefield,” said a local volunteer who helped transport the injured to a nearby clinic.
Civil Defence Confirms Drone and Tank Shelling
Gaza Civil Defence spokesperson Mahmud Bassal confirmed that the attack involved both drone strikes and tank shelling. “Israeli drones fired at the citizens. Some minutes later, Israeli tanks fired several shells at the citizens, which led to a large number of martyrs and wounded,” he stated.
Thousands had gathered at the site to receive flour and other basic necessities as hunger spreads rapidly across the Gaza Strip. According to international agencies, the region is facing unprecedented levels of acute malnutrition and starvation, particularly among children.
The distribution point was part of the new GHF system, introduced last month to replace the United Nations-led aid program. While Israel claims the new mechanism prevents Hamas from intercepting aid, it has come under fire for its lack of safety and transparency, especially as attacks near distribution points have become frequent and deadly.
There has been no immediate response from the Israeli military regarding massacre on Monday. Calls for independent investigations and international accountability have grown louder as the death toll from aid-related attacks continues to rise.
U.S. President Donald Trump has once again taken a hardline stance amid escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, saying he is not interested in brokering a temporary ceasefire but wants a “real end” to the conflict. Speaking to reporters on board Air Force One, Trump issued a sharp warning to Tehran, declaring that any attack on U.S. personnel would be met with severe consequences.
“If they do anything to our people, we will come down so hard,” Trump said. “Then the gloves are off. I think they know not to touch our troops.”
The statement comes at a time when the region remains on edge after Israel launched large-scale strikes inside Iran, targeting nuclear and military sites. Iran has promised to retaliate but has so far not directly hit U.S. assets in the region. Trump’s remarks signal that the U.S. is prepared for a military response if provoked, further complicating efforts for de-escalation.
Ceasefire Not Enough, Says Trump
When asked if he was working toward a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Trump rejected the idea of a temporary truce. “A real end, not a ceasefire,” he said, suggesting that only a permanent resolution to hostilities would be acceptable. “Giving up entirely is OK, too,” he added, alluding to expectations that Iran might abandon its retaliatory plans altogether.
Trump’s remarks suggest a pivot from traditional diplomatic language that often seeks temporary pauses in fighting to negotiate peace. Instead, his tone emphasizes finality — an end to Iran’s nuclear ambitions and possibly its involvement in regional proxy wars.
His statement also aligns with long-standing U.S. policy, reiterated by several administrations, that Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon. Trump has repeatedly echoed this in recent speeches, arguing that Washington’s main concern remains Iran’s nuclear capacity, rather than the military tit-for-tat with Israel.
Vice President Vance ‘May’ Be Sent for Talks
Despite his strong rhetoric, Trump hinted at possible diplomatic engagement. He said he “may” send Vice President JD Vance and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with Iranian officials if conditions allow. “It depends on what happens when I get back,” he told reporters, implying that a decision will be made after assessing Iran’s next moves.
The possibility of sending high-level envoys indicates that the White House still sees dialogue as a tool to prevent further escalation, even as it maintains a posture of deterrence.
Vice President Vance, a political newcomer with a military background, has taken a growing role in foreign policy matters since joining the Trump ticket. Envoy Steve Witkoff, a long-time Trump associate, has been active behind the scenes, liaising with Middle Eastern allies in recent weeks.
At least 38 Palestinians were shot dead on Monday as Israeli forces opened fire on crowds attempting to reach food distribution centers in Gaza. Most of the victims were in Rafah, in southern Gaza, where people gathered near aid trucks operated under the new Israeli- and US-backed aid delivery mechanism.
According to medical sources who spoke to Al Jazeera, this marks the deadliest single day since the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) system began last month. The Israeli military has not issued a comment on the latest shootings. In previous incidents, the army claimed that soldiers had fired warning shots toward people they suspected of posing a threat, but often did not confirm whether those rounds struck anyone.
Monday’s attack is part of a pattern. Since late May, over 300 Palestinians have been killed and more than 2,000 wounded while trying to access aid centers through the new system. Human rights groups have called the shootings unjustified and in violation of international humanitarian law.
Palestinians Face Impossible Choice to Starve or Get Shot
The situation on the ground remains grim for ordinary Gazans. With food scarcity worsening and Israel’s blockade limiting supplies, families are forced to take life-threatening risks just to put bread on the table. Crowds, including women and children, must cross active military zones and navigate barbed wire to reach the distribution points.
“I knew the soldiers might shoot, but my children haven’t eaten in two days,” said Mahmoud, a father of four who was injured during one of the aid runs. “This is not aid. It is humiliation and slaughter.”
The distribution points are run by the GHF, a private contractor working in coordination with Israeli and US authorities. The organization claims it operates with strict security measures, but eyewitnesses report a lack of coordination and crowd control. With each day, more Palestinians are forced to choose between starvation and the gunfire of Israeli forces.
Despite growing international outrage, the aid centers continue to function under this highly militarized framework. Independent observers have not been allowed to monitor the sites, raising concerns about transparency and accountability.
The GHF aid distribution system was launched to replace the United Nations-led operation that had delivered aid throughout Gaza since the war began 20 months ago. Israel and the United States argue that the new mechanism is necessary to prevent Hamas from diverting aid supplies for military use.
Critics say the new system lacks oversight, punishes civilians, and has become a tool of collective punishment. “It’s a political experiment using human lives,” said an official from a regional humanitarian group, speaking on condition of anonymity. “The old system wasn’t perfect, but it saved lives. This one is killing them.”
While some limited aid has trickled in, much of Gaza remains under extreme food insecurity. Aid trucks are few and far between, and even when they arrive, chaos erupts due to desperate crowds and lack of coordination with local authorities.
Global Condemnation Grows, Israel Silent
Monday’s massacre has triggered renewed condemnation from humanitarian organizations and international observers. However, as of Tuesday morning, neither the Israeli military nor the US State Department had issued a formal response to the latest incident at the aid centers.
The UN Human Rights Office has called for an immediate investigation into the shootings and demanded access for independent monitors. “This level of civilian casualties at aid distribution sites is absolutely unacceptable,” a spokesperson said in Geneva.
As pressure mounts, questions remain over whether Israel will continue with the GHF system, and whether the international community will step in to safeguard aid distribution in Gaza.
Leaders of the G7 nations on Monday called for an immediate “de-escalation” in the Middle East, with a specific focus on ending hostilities between Israel and Iran and pushing for a ceasefire in Gaza. The joint statement, released by host nation Canada, stressed the urgent need to protect civilians and prevent a broader regional war.
“We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza,” the statement read. While recognizing Israel’s right to self-defense, the G7 emphasized the importance of safeguarding civilian lives amid growing casualties on both sides.
The statement followed Israel’s recent launch of a large-scale air campaign — codenamed Operation Rising Lion — targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, military sites, and private homes. The attacks have killed dozens, including top Iranian scientists and commanders, while also striking civilian areas, prompting outrage in Tehran and beyond.
The leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States reiterated their shared stance that “Iran must never acquire a nuclear weapon,” as fears rise over further regional escalation.
Trump Leaves G7 Early, Denies Involvement in Ceasefire Talks
US President Donald Trump abruptly left the G7 summit on Monday, fueling speculation that Washington was preparing to intervene diplomatically or militarily in the ongoing conflict. French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters that Trump had offered a proposal for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.
“There is indeed an offer to meet and exchange,” Macron said. “An offer was made especially to get a ceasefire and to then kick-start broader discussions.”
However, Trump immediately denied Macron’s claims on his Truth Social account. “Macron mistakenly said that I left the G7 Summit in Canada to go back to D.C. to work on a ‘ceasefire’ between Israel and Iran,” he posted. “Wrong! He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a ceasefire. Much bigger than that.”
A White House official later confirmed that the US president would not sign the G7 draft statement and insisted that American forces remained in a “defensive posture.” Trump has not confirmed whether the US will participate in Israeli military operations.
Civilian Death Toll Rises as Conflict Spreads
The human cost of the Israel-Iran conflict continues to climb. Iranian authorities report more than 224 civilians killed and over 1,000 injured since Friday, with strikes hitting residential areas, nuclear research centers, and military outposts. In the latest attack, three people were killed and four wounded when an Israeli missile struck a checkpoint in Kashan city, Isfahan province.
Iranian media reported explosions and anti-aircraft fire in Tehran early Tuesday. Defensive systems also activated in Natanz, home to key nuclear facilities. Local reports suggest heavy damage, although Iranian officials have not confirmed the full extent.
Israel says at least 24 of its citizens have been killed in Iranian counterstrikes, most of them civilians.
President Macron separately warned against forcing regime change in Tehran. “Aiming to overthrow the Iranian regime would be a strategic mistake,” he said. “All who have thought that by bombing from the outside you can save a country in spite of itself have always been mistaken.”
Iran has announced that it will take “firm and immediate” action against individuals accused of spying for Israel. The country’s judiciary spokesperson, Asghar Jahangir, confirmed that Iranian authorities have already opened cases against the suspects and will move quickly to prosecute them.
“Those who have been identified in recent days as being involved in espionage have immediately had cases opened against them, and they will be punished for their vile deeds in the shortest possible time,” Jahangir told Mehr News Agency. He described the alleged spies and collaborators as “mercenaries” of Israel who pose a direct threat to Iran’s national security.
This announcement follows a broader campaign by Iranian intelligence services to crack down on foreign influence and espionage, particularly amid rising tensions with Israel. Iranian officials believe Israeli spy agency Mossad has been operating within the country to sabotage infrastructure and gather sensitive state information.
Execution Signals Tehran’s Tough Stance
Earlier this week, Iran hanged a man accused of leaking classified military and security information to Israel. The execution, which was reported by the judiciary-linked Mizan Online, came after a swift trial behind closed doors. The executed individual was allegedly found guilty of providing strategic intelligence to Israel’s enemies, including details about sensitive facilities and internal communications.
Human rights groups have condemned the use of the death penalty in such cases, citing concerns over transparency and fair trial standards. However, Iranian officials defended the decision, saying national security crimes demand the harshest penalties. According to authorities, the execution serves as a warning to others considering cooperation with foreign intelligence agencies.
The judiciary has not disclosed the total number of individuals currently detained, but officials confirmed that several people with suspected Mossad links remain in custody. These cases are expected to move quickly through Iran’s Revolutionary Courts, known for handling national security-related trials.
Iran Accuses Mossad of Destabilization
Iran has long accused Mossad of orchestrating covert operations inside the country, including assassinations of nuclear scientists, cyberattacks, and sabotage missions. Tehran claims these activities are part of a broader Israeli agenda to destabilize Iran and provoke internal unrest.
In recent months, Iranian intelligence agencies have intensified surveillance and arrests targeting individuals believed to be connected with Western powers. Security agencies argue that Mossad and its allies are attempting to exploit internal divisions and fuel instability at a time when Iran is under intense international scrutiny over its nuclear program and regional policies.
Iran’s leaders have vowed not to tolerate foreign interference and warned that anyone caught aiding Israel will face severe consequences. “The message is clear: betrayal will be met with justice—and swiftly,” said an Iranian official familiar with the cases.
Tehran-based political analyst Abas Aslani has accused Israel of waging a campaign of “psychological warfare” against Iran. Speaking to local media, Aslani said Israel’s strategy relies heavily on creating fear through targeted assassinations and heightened threats.
“Israel has been trying to intimidate the public and increasing the level of their threats in order to stop Iran from responding to Israeli attacks,” said Aslani, who serves as a senior research fellow at the Center for Middle East Strategic Studies.
According to him, Israel’s aim is to deter a full-scale Iranian response by projecting military superiority and unpredictability. However, Aslani stressed that Iran’s silence should not be mistaken for weakness. He said Tehran is carefully weighing its options, especially because it wants to avoid triggering a direct intervention from the United States.
Israeli Tactics Backfiring, Say Experts
Rather than instill fear or divide the nation, Israel’s aggressive posture appears to have unified the Iranian public, Aslani argued. He claimed that every new strike or threat strengthens the collective Iranian stance against foreign pressure.
“What Israel is doing may look powerful on the outside, but inside Iran, it is only creating more resolve. It’s actually building national unity,” he explained. “The Israeli strikes will not deter the country from responding.”
Other Iranian commentators have echoed similar sentiments, suggesting that Tel Aviv’s approach has only deepened public support for Iran’s regional policies and military preparedness. Even among critics of the government, there is growing outrage over what many perceive as Israeli provocations aimed at undermining Iranian sovereignty.
This sense of shared defiance could reshape public discourse in Iran, particularly around military defense, foreign policy, and Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
Iran Holds Back Amid US Concerns
Aslani believes Iran is deliberately holding back from responding with full military force to avoid pulling the US into a direct confrontation. Despite repeated Israeli attacks and covert operations inside Iran, the country has not yet launched a major retaliatory strike.
“The fact is that Iran so far has not come with full force yet because they have kept open the possibility the US might engage in this conflict,” said Aslani. He warned that a larger confrontation could easily spiral into a regional war.
Iran’s leadership, according to multiple sources, is assessing both military and diplomatic responses. While covert countermeasures have reportedly taken place, Tehran is expected to act more openly if Israel continues to escalate tensions.
With the situation hanging in a delicate balance, observers are watching for any misstep that could trigger wider conflict. For now, the war of nerves continues—with Israel pushing psychological pressure, and Iran quietly preparing its next move.
The world of smartphones is evolving fast—and 2025 has turned out to be a revolutionary year. The classic rectangular slabs we once called phones are now giving way to something much more exciting. With foldable phones, flip phones, and even rollable screens taking center stage, smartphone innovation is moving at lightning speed.
Today’s phones are not only smarter, they’re reshaping themselves to fit your life. This year, tech news headlines are dominated by futuristic designs, flexible displays, and innovation that was once science fiction.
From futuristic designs to compact technology, the mobile trends of 2025 are reshaping how we think about devices. If you’re wondering what’s next for the phone in your pocket, this blog dives deep into the most futuristic designs redefining smartphones today.
The Foldable Phones of 2025
Foldable phones 2025 have evolved into sleek, durable, and power-packed devices that rival the most advanced flagship models. Once mocked for their fragility and high prices, they now dominate global tech news thanks to massive improvements in display flexibility, hinge technology, and usability.
Key Highlights:
Ultra-flexible foldable displays that withstand 300,000+ folds.
Larger screen real estate—perfect for multitasking, gaming, and content creation.
Seamless hinge mechanisms with water and dust resistance.
Thinner body and lighter weight, making them as portable as traditional phones.
The most popular foldable models in 2025 include:
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 with a triple-fold display.
Huawei Mate X5 Pro featuring a roll-out OLED screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 with AI-driven Flex View.
With powerful chipsets and 5G-6G readiness, these devices are no longer just premium collectibles—they are everyday productivity tools for professionals and creators alike.
Flip Phones Make a Comeback
Believe it or not, flip phones have made a grand comeback in 2025. But these aren’t your early 2000s pocket clamshells—they’re stylish, smart, and ultra-modern. Thanks to foldable display technology, flip-style phones now fold vertically to offer compact designs without compromising screen size or performance.
Dual displays: A small external screen for notifications, and a full-size foldable screen inside.
AI-powered Flex Modes: Split-screen photography, hands-free video calls, and gesture controls.
Enhanced durability with Corning’s new flexible glass tech.
Consumers are embracing flip phones for their pocketability, nostalgic feel, and fashion-forward design. Major influencers, celebrities, and vloggers are even making flip phones a style statement—driving a surge in demand.
Some top picks:
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6
OPPO Find N Flip
Google Pixel Flip
With advanced camera systems, smooth foldable displays, and 5G/6G support, flip phones are proving that compact can be powerful.
Rollables, Slides, and Shape-Shifters
Beyond foldables and flips, 2025 has introduced rollable and slide-out smartphones that truly look like something out of a sci-fi movie. This emerging futuristic phone design trend takes flexibility to the next level—literally.
Rollable phones feature extendable screens that expand horizontally or vertically with a swipe or gesture. You can switch between phone and tablet modes without folding anything. These devices use motorized mechanisms and stretchable OLED panels for an ultra-smooth, edge-to-edge experience.
Some standout innovations:
LG RollPro Max — expands from 6.8″ to 10.1″ in seconds.
TCL SlideVision — uses a wraparound rollable screen with no visible crease.
Vivo X Slide — integrates AI-controlled screen resizing based on app usage.
Why Rollables Are the Next Big Thing:
No hinges = fewer mechanical failures.
Dynamic screen sizes for content creation, gaming, and multi-app use.
Sleek, slab-like body when retracted—ideal for portability.
Though still pricey, rollables are capturing attention due to their ultra-modern aesthetics and multi-functionality. Analysts say this could be the future of flagship devices.
The Key Trends Driving Mobile Design Innovation in 2025
Several mobile trends in 2025 are fueling these design shifts:
1. Demand for Multitasking & Bigger Screens
Consumers now work, stream, shop, and game from their phones. Foldables and rollables cater to this demand by expanding screen sizes without expanding pocket size.
2. Advancements in Flexible OLED Technology
The durability and clarity of flexible screens have improved dramatically. Now, foldable phones last longer and perform better under stress, making them more mainstream.
3. Rise of Digital Nomads & Hybrid Work
Portable devices that function as both phone and tablet are ideal for remote professionals. These hybrid designs meet the need for on-the-go productivity.
4. Influencer & Pop Culture Impact
TikTok creators, vloggers, and even fashion houses are endorsing flip phones as a blend of tech and style. Their portability and camera flexibility make them ideal for creators.
5. Sustainability & Repairability
Many new foldables and flips now use modular parts, reducing e-waste and making repairs easier. Some brands even offer recycled material phones that fold.
Tech News Flash: Global Adoption Is Booming
In 2025, tech news outlets report that foldable phone sales have crossed 50 million units globally, and the Asia-Pacific region is leading adoption. Companies are investing heavily in this sector, and more startups are joining the foldable race.
These are proof that foldables and shape-shifting phones are more than a trend—they’re a shift in the mobile paradigm.
What’s Next for Smartphone Innovation?
The next frontier may involve transparent screens, holographic displays, or mind-controlled interfaces. Brands like Apple, Samsung, and Google are already working on smart glasses and AI-first devices—hinting that even today’s foldables may become obsolete within a few years.
However, for now, foldable phones 2025 are the pinnacle of mobile innovation. They balance form and function, offering dynamic experiences for work, play, and everything in between.
Final Thoughts
In 2025, smartphones are no longer just tools—they’re shape-shifting companions tailored to how we live and create. With foldables, flips, and rollables gaining momentum, smartphone innovation is rewriting the rules of design, interaction, and productivity.
Whether you love the flexibility of a foldable phone, the nostalgic charm of a flip device, or the cutting-edge appeal of rollable screens, one thing is certain: The future of mobile is flexible.
Israeli medics have confirmed there were no injuries in the most recent wave of Iranian missile strikes on central and northern Israel. The announcement came just moments after military authorities lifted shelter orders in northern regions, easing public concern for now.
The Magen David Adom (MDA) emergency service, Israel’s national ambulance and rescue organization, reported that it received no calls regarding injuries from the latest barrage of missiles launched by Iran.
“Our teams were on high alert across central and northern Israel,” said an MDA spokesperson. “Thankfully, we did not receive any reports of casualties or injuries in this wave of attacks.”
This update was confirmed shortly after Israeli military forces announced that the situation had stabilized enough to allow civilians in northern Israel to leave their shelters. The defense systems, including the Iron Dome, appear to have successfully intercepted a large number of incoming threats, limiting the damage.
This comes amid heightened tensions in the region, with previous Iranian attacks causing deadly consequences.
Earlier Strikes Have Already Claimed 24 Lives
While the latest attack caused no harm, Iranian missile strikes earlier in the conflict have resulted in at least 24 deaths across Israel, according to official sources.
The deadliest wave came two days ago, when multiple long-range missiles hit residential and military targets. Among the victims were both civilians and soldiers, prompting widespread international condemnation and calls for restraint.
Security analysts say Iran is sending a clear signal of military strength while trying to avoid further escalation. However, Israeli officials remain on high alert, with air defense systems on standby and the military ready for further retaliation.
The conflict has gripped international headlines and dominated global and regional news today, as fears grow of a broader war spilling across the Middle East.
Tensions Continue, But Current Wave Ends Quietly
Though the latest strikes have ended without injury, tensions remain extremely high across the region. The Israeli military is continuing to monitor airspace closely and has not ruled out further action in response to Iran’s aggression.
Political leaders in both Israel and Iran have used strong language in recent statements. Israel’s Prime Minister warned that any further attacks “will be met with full force,” while Iranian officials insist their actions are in retaliation for previous Israeli aggression.
Despite calls for peace from international organizations, including the United Nations and the European Union, there has been no diplomatic breakthrough. News today continues to show scenes of military readiness, sirens, and citizens seeking shelter as both sides brace for what may come next.
Independent Senator Bernie Sanders has introduced new legislation to prevent any unauthorized U.S. military action against Iran. The bill, titled the No War Against Iran Act, aims to limit President Donald Trump’s ability to launch strikes without explicit Congressional approval.
Sanders Warns Against Netanyahu’s “War of Choice”
In a sharply worded statement, Sanders criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent actions, calling them “reckless” and “illegal.”
“Netanyahu’s reckless and illegal attacks violate international law and risk igniting a regional war,” Sanders said. “Congress must make it clear that the United States will not be dragged into Netanyahu’s war of choice.”
The Vermont Senator emphasized the need for accountability. He argued that the U.S. must not support unilateral military escalation in the Middle East—especially without public debate or legal justification.
Bernie Sanders shares No war Against Iran Act on X
Bill Aims to Reinforce Congressional War Powers
The No War Against Iran Act would prohibit the use of federal funds for any military action targeting Iran unless authorized by Congress. Sanders stressed that the U.S. Constitution gives war powers solely to the legislative branch.
“Our Founding Fathers entrusted the power of war and peace exclusively to the people’s elected representatives in Congress,” he said. “It is imperative that we make clear that the President has no authority to embark on another costly war without explicit authorisation by Congress.”
Sanders has long advocated for restoring Congressional control over military decisions. He argues that post-9/11 authorizations have been exploited for decades to justify endless wars without accountability.
Slim Chances of Passing, Strong Message Sent
Although the bill has support from several Democratic senators, including Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, it faces a tough road ahead. Republicans currently control both the Senate and the House of Representatives. Even if it passed both chambers, former President Trump—if re-elected—would likely veto it.
Still, Sanders’s proposal sends a clear message to the White House and the Pentagon. It reflects growing concern among lawmakers that another conflict in the Middle East could have devastating consequences for regional stability and American credibility.
Analysts note that while the bill may not become law, it contributes to a larger conversation about checks and balances. It also reflects growing unease among Democrats—and some independents—about Trump’s foreign policy approach, particularly his support for Israeli military actions.
As tensions rise in the Middle East, Pakistan has firmly rejected a fake video suggesting its involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. The video falsely claimed that Pakistan threatened to strike Israel with nuclear weapons if Iran were attacked. Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar labeled it as fabricated and AI-generated, emphasizing Pakistan’s longstanding nuclear policy rooted in deterrence and self-defense.
Foreign Minister Responds in Senate
During a Senate session on June 16, Ishaq Dar addressed the viral video allegedly showing Iranian official Mohsen Rezaei quoting Pakistan on nuclear retaliation. He clarified that Pakistan never made such a statement. Dar said the video was proven fake by iVerify Pakistan and warned of growing disinformation amid a serious regional war.
He also debunked another false video of former US President Donald Trump allegedly asking Pakistan to stay out of the conflict. Similarly, a recycled 2011 interview of Israeli PM Netanyahu was falsely presented as recent. Dar stressed the need for caution, calling the spread of such content dangerous.
Dar highlighted diplomatic efforts during the crisis. He stayed in contact with Iranian and Omani counterparts involved in US-Iran nuclear talks. Pakistan also helped arrange a UN Security Council meeting within 24 hours of Israel’s attacks.
Pakistan launched evacuation efforts for citizens in Iran. So far, 251 students have returned, with hundreds of pilgrims (zaireen) being assisted. Additionally, Pakistan agreed to help repatriate 20,000 Iranian pilgrims from Saudi Arabia, offering visas on arrival at Karachi airport.
Pakistan’s Nuclear Stance Remains Firm
Dar reaffirmed that Pakistan’s nuclear doctrine, unchanged since 1998, is defensive. He criticized any narrative promoting nuclear aggression. He reminded the Senate that Pakistan, like Israel and India, is not a signatory to the NPT, but remains committed to international nuclear safety norms.
Defence Minister Warns Against Israeli Aggression
Defence Minister Khawaja Asif echoed concerns, urging the global community to remain wary of Israel’s unchecked nuclear capabilities. He warned that Israel’s aggression could destabilize the entire region and that Western support for Tel Aviv may lead to broader conflict.
In a strong response to Indian-sponsored terrorism, Pakistan’s security forces killed five terrorists in two intelligence-based operations (IBOs) across Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The operations, conducted on June 15 and 16, targeted members of the banned group Fitna al Khawarij, a network allegedly linked to Indian proxies, according to Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR).
Major Success in Peshawar
In the first operation, troops surrounded a hideout in Peshawar district believed to be sheltering militants. After a fierce gunfight, four terrorists were killed, including high-profile operatives Kharji Haris and Kharji Baseer. ISPR confirmed their deaths and labeled the strike a major blow to enemy-backed subversion efforts.
In a separate IBO in North Waziristan, forces engaged another terrorist in a shootout and killed him. Troops recovered weapons, explosives, and ammunition from the site.
Area Secured After Operation
Following the gun battles, security forces launched sanitisation operations in both Peshawar and North Waziristan to ensure the areas were cleared of any remaining threats.
Nation’s Leadership Applauds Forces
President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif praised the security forces for their swift and decisive actions. The president emphasized that operations against Fitna al Khawarij would continue until terrorism is fully eradicated. Prime Minister Sharif warned that those who harm innocent citizens would face severe consequences, saying, “Anti-human terrorists will have to pay a heavy price.”
The government’s resolve to crush terrorism remains firm as military and intelligence agencies intensify counter-terror operations across the country.
The Israel-Iran conflict has entered its most volatile phase yet, following Israel’s surprise airstrikes on Iran last Friday. In the days since, both nations have exchanged deadly attacks, marking the most intense confrontation in their history.
Massive Israeli Strikes Hit Strategic Targets
Israel launched a wave of airstrikes across Iran, hitting over 100 key sites. These included nuclear facilities, missile bases, and military command centers. Satellite images revealed heavy damage at Natanz, Iran’s main nuclear enrichment site, although the core fuel facility remained intact. A research center in Isfahan also took a direct hit.
Among those killed were top Iranian officials, including the armed forces chief Maj Gen Mohammad Bagheri and IRGC commander Gen Hossein Salami. At least six nuclear scientists also died.
In retaliation, Iran launched several missile waves into Israeli territory. By Monday, at least 14 people in Israel had been killed and 390 injured. Major hits included a residential building in Tamra and a missile strike in Bat Yam, near Tel Aviv. Fires broke out at a power plant in Haifa after another missile landed there.
Israel Targets Tehran’s Defenses
Israel intensified its operations over the weekend, claiming air dominance over Tehran. It said it struck over 80 additional targets, including Iran’s defense ministry headquarters and missile platforms. Iran’s health ministry reported 224 civilian deaths from Israeli attacks since Friday.
Global Reactions and Threats
Iran warned the US, UK, and France that their military bases would be targeted if they intervened. The US Navy reportedly helped intercept Iranian missiles on Friday. Meanwhile, the UK began moving forces into the region.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu justified the attacks by claiming Iran was close to building nuclear weapons. He cited reports suggesting Iran could construct up to nine nuclear bombs.
The crisis halted scheduled US-Iran nuclear talks. Iran told Qatar and Oman it would not negotiate under fire.
US President Donald Trump confirmed the US had prior knowledge of the strikes, though officials called them “unilateral.”
As global air travel rebounds, a new list of the safest airlines 2025 offers fresh reassurance to passengers. AirlineRatings.com, a leading aviation safety and product rating website, has released its annual rankings of the Top 25 Safest Full-Service and Low-Cost Airlines. The assessment covers 385 global carriers, highlighting those with the best records in operational safety, training, and compliance.
How Airlines Are Ranked
The rankings rely on several key factors. These include fleet age, number of incidents, fatalities, IOSA (IATA Operational Safety Audit) certification, ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) audits, pilot training standards, and airline financial stability.
The list arrives shortly after renewed global concerns about air travel safety, following the tragic Air India crash that claimed 270 lives. In this context, the report aims to guide travelers in making safer airline choices.
Topping the full-service list is Air New Zealand, followed by Qantas, Cathay Pacific, Qatar Airways, and Emirates. Other notable names include:
Virgin Australia
Etihad Airways
ANA (All Nippon Airways)
Korean Air
Turkish Airlines
Lufthansa/Swiss
British Airways
American Airlines
Delta Airlines
United Airlines
These airlines earned praise for their consistent safety practices, experienced crews, and modern fleets.
Top 25 Low-Cost Airlines for 2025
In the low-cost category, HK Express ranks first, followed by Jetstar Group, Ryanair, easyJet, and Frontier Airlines. The list also includes:
Wizz Air
VietJet Air
Southwest Airlines
JetBlue Airways
Air Arabia
IndiGo
Cebu Pacific
Air Baltic
These budget carriers demonstrated excellent safety records despite operating under tighter margins.
Confidence in the Skies
AirlineRatings.com emphasized that these rankings help rebuild traveler trust and highlight airlines that prioritize safety without compromise. The 2025 list reflects the industry’s ongoing efforts to maintain high standards amid rising demand and evolving threats.
A viral video from a recent Talha Anjum concert incident has taken social media by storm. The Pakistani rapper is seen dragging a fan onstage after allegedly being hit by a thrown bottle during a live performance. The footage has sparked intense debate online, with many questioning the artist’s reaction and the event’s security protocols.
Incident Caught on Camera
The video shows Talha Anjum performing when he suddenly stops, points into the crowd, and directs security to bring someone to the stage. Moments later, the fan is forcibly pulled up by the hair, reportedly by Anjum and an associate. After briefly restraining him, security staff escorted the individual backstage.
The alleged bottle-throwing appears to be the trigger. Although details remain unconfirmed, eyewitnesses claim the fan hurled the object at the rapper, prompting the dramatic response.
As of now, neither Talha Anjum nor his team have issued any formal comment. The silence has only fueled speculation and divided public opinion. While some fans defend Anjum’s actions as a response to provocation, others argue the move was excessive and unprofessional.
Viral Reactions and Safety Concerns
The video has already racked up millions of views across platforms, trending widely in Pakistan. Critics have raised concerns about safety standards at live events, calling for better crowd control and stricter preventive measures.
The incident also raises questions about performer conduct in the face of hostility. While artists deserve protection, many argue that taking physical action against a fan sets a dangerous precedent.
Security Under Scrutiny
This episode has turned attention to event management teams and their role in ensuring safety — both for performers and the audience. Many now urge concert organizers to review protocols, especially for large, high-energy shows where tensions can quickly escalate.
As the footage continues to circulate, fans await clarity from Talha Anjum’s camp. Until then, the video remains a focal point of debate across music and media circles.
In a historic move, the UK has named Blaise Metreweli as its first-ever MI6 female chief, marking a major milestone for the country’s intelligence services.
A Groundbreaking Appointment
Metreweli will become the 18th head of MI6, officially known as the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS). She is set to take over this autumn from Richard Moore, the outgoing chief. The UK government said the appointment reflects the growing importance of modern intelligence work in an era of digital warfare and geopolitical tension.
From ‘Q’ to ‘C’
Currently serving as MI6’s Director General of Technology and Innovation — known internally as “Q” — Metreweli will assume the codename “C” as chief, a title traditionally used for MI6 heads. The popular James Bond franchise may call its spy boss “M,” but in real life, “C” is the designation for the top spy.
Metreweli began her career in intelligence in 1999 after studying anthropology at Cambridge University. Over the years, she held several senior roles in both MI6 and MI5, focusing heavily on operational assignments in the Middle East and Europe.
Her elevation follows a broader trend of increasing female leadership across the UK’s intelligence community. MI5 appointed its first female head, Stella Rimington, in 1992, while GCHQ named Anne Keast-Butler as its director in 2023.
